| From: | "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | PARIS Nicolas <niparisco(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGSQL 9.3 - Materialized View - multithreading |
| Date: | 2014-04-04 20:34:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20140404203446.GG25879@aart.rice.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 10:26:22PM +0200, PARIS Nicolas wrote:
> this postgres documentation :
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/ecpg-connect.html
> says it is actually possible to manage connection in C stored procedure.
>
> I may be wrong...
>
>
> Le 04/04/2014 22:14, Thom Brown a écrit :
> > lear on how triggers come into this. You can't have triggers
> > on materialized views, and they don't fire triggers on tables or views
> > that they are based o
>
Hi,
I do not know if it can be used in this fashion, but could pl/proxy be
used by defining a cluster to be the same server and use a partitioned
remote call? Someone with pl/proxy experience may have more information.
Regards,
Ken
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Varadharajan Mukundan | 2014-04-05 01:13:12 | Re: Fwd: Slow Count-Distinct Query |
| Previous Message | Reza Taheri | 2014-04-04 20:27:34 | Re: PGSQL, checkpoints, and file system syncs |