| From: | Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org, christian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: New repmgr packages |
| Date: | 2014-04-02 15:52:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20140402155237.GK4332@msgid.df7cb.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
Re: Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2014-04-02 <1396442683(dot)3559(dot)20(dot)camel(at)asus02-laptop04(dot)gunduz(dot)org>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 18:03 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
>
> > I'm not very involved on this and I might be missing some piece of
> > information, but why does the the Debian packages have the pgdg tag on
> > the name while the RHEL don't?
>
> I don't know why Debian folks use it, but RPMs have never did it this
> way. I personally would like to omit using PGDG for the software that is
> not being developed by them.
The packages in the apt.postgresql.org repository have "pgdg" in the
version number because the repo is operated by PostgreSQL. That's to
make clear where the packages where built.
The version number from the original Debian package is suffixed with
.pgdgNN+1, where NN is the Debian or Ubuntu version they target.
Christoph
--
cb(at)df7cb(dot)de | http://www.df7cb.de/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martín Marqués | 2014-04-02 17:01:03 | Re: New repmgr packages |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-04-02 15:25:36 | Re: Moving to git |