From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Useless "Replica Identity: NOTHING" noise from psql \d |
Date: | 2014-03-26 15:28:59 |
Message-ID: | 20140326152859.GA24628@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:20:07PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 09:07:07PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > In the "INDEX" case, should the output mention specifically which index
> > > > is being considered?
> > >
> > > Ah, good idea. Updated patch attached. The output is now:
> > >
> > > test=> \d+ test
> > > Table "public.test"
> > > Column | Type | Modifiers | Storage | Stats target | Description
> > > --------+---------+-----------+---------+--------------+-------------
> > > x | integer | not null | plain | |
> > > Indexes:
> > > "test_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (x) REPLICA IDENTITY
> > > "i_test2" btree (x)
> > > --> Replica Identity: USING INDEX "test_pkey"
> > > Has OIDs: no
> > >
> > > However, now that I look at it, it seems redundant as REPLICA IDENTITY
> > > is already marked on the actual index. Ideas?
> >
> > Hearing nothing, I have gone back to the previous patch that just marks
> > replica identity as USING INDEX; applied patch attached.
>
> Not opposed to this, but it seems a bit strange; REPLICA IDENTITY is a
> property of the table, not of any individual index. I think we should
> lose the token in the "Indexes" section.
That is an interesting idea. It would mean that \d table would not show
anything about replica identity, because right now it does:
test=> \d test
Table "public.test"
Column | Type | Modifiers
--------+---------+-----------
x | integer | not null
Indexes:
"test_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (x) REPLICA IDENTITY
That seems logical. So under the new plan, \d would show:
test=> \d test
Table "public.test"
Column | Type | Modifiers
--------+---------+-----------
x | integer | not null
Indexes:
"test_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (x)
and \d+ would show:
test=> \d+ test
Table "public.test"
Column | Type | Modifiers | Storage | Stats target | Description
--------+---------+-----------+---------+--------------+-------------
x | integer | not null | plain | |
Indexes:
"test_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (x)
Replica Identity: USING INDEX "test_pkey"
Has OIDs: no
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-03-26 15:37:28 | Re: small regression adjustment |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-03-26 15:20:07 | Re: Useless "Replica Identity: NOTHING" noise from psql \d |