| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pg(at)heroku(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PQclientEncoding() returns -1, resulting in possible assertion failure in psql |
| Date: | 2014-03-23 00:17:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20140323001711.GA5606@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:55:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, hearing nothing, I dug into this, and I think the solution is
> > simpler than we thought. Basically, the Assert is checking for the
> > encoding value to be in a valid range, but the main code is also
> > checking for an invalid encoding and returning PG_SQL_ASCII:
>
> Agreed that that's pretty useless. I wonder though why these functions
> are not coded like
>
> return PG_VALID_ENCODING(encoding) ?
> ((*pg_wchar_table[encoding].mblen) ((const unsigned char *) mbstr)) :
> ((*pg_wchar_table[PG_SQL_ASCII].mblen) ((const unsigned char *) mbstr)));
>
> instead of the hard-to-read explicit range check.
Agreed. Modified patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| mblen.diff | text/x-diff | 3.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2014-03-24 02:42:22 | Re: BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-03-22 15:59:13 | Re: PQclientEncoding() returns -1, resulting in possible assertion failure in psql |