| From: | Christian Kruse <christian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: New repmgr packages |
| Date: | 2014-03-21 07:39:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20140321073948.GB19676@defunct.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
Hi,
On 20/03/14 18:51, Martín Marqués wrote:
> Now, I started thinking of something that maybe Christian or Jaime can
> answer which is not related to packaging (at least not directly) but
> has big influence in it: Do we need different repmgr compilations for
> the different versions of PostgreSQL?
This is a good question.
After checking it three times it should be safe doing that. We're only
using some version-dependent macros which get resolved by
compile-time, and the changes on that macros are backwards-compatible.
That said I have to admit that I didn't test it. Before doing so I
would definitely want to test it.
Best regards,
--
Christian Kruse http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martín Marqués | 2014-03-25 20:40:15 | Re: New repmgr packages |
| Previous Message | Martín Marqués | 2014-03-20 21:51:59 | Re: New repmgr packages |