| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | mgerstein(at)gopivotal(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #9478: Greenplum External Table definitions |
| Date: | 2014-03-19 01:00:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20140319010050.GB16122@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 09:07:10PM +0000, mgerstein(at)gopivotal(dot)com wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 9478
> Logged by: Michael Gerstein
> Email address: mgerstein(at)gopivotal(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: Unsupported/Unknown
> Operating system: Linux
> Description:
>
> "PostgreSQL 8.2.15 (Greenplum Database 4.3.0.0 build 3) on
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 4.4.2 compiled on Nov 23
> 2013 01:22:06"
>
> After the version 1.10.5 external table definition is broken for Greenplum
> database.
> While the query properly returns the datatypes for the columns (checked in
> Greenplum), the types are not shown in the table definition. Since Ext.
> table definition is in separate file in the souce, I guess, there is the bug
> somewhere there, which omits column types.
This is a Greenplum bug, rather than a Postgres one. I suggest you
contact Greenplum.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Gerstein | 2014-03-19 01:05:12 | Re: BUG #9478: Greenplum External Table definitions |
| Previous Message | Sergey Konoplev | 2014-03-19 00:29:05 | Re: BUG #9135: PostgreSQL doesn't want use index scan instead of (index scan+sort+limit) |