From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Replication slots and footguns |
Date: | 2014-03-13 11:07:39 |
Message-ID: | 20140313110739.GD8268@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-03-12 13:34:47 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 03/12/2014 12:34 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>> Urgh. That error message looks susceptible to improvement. How about:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> replication slot "%s" cannot be dropped because it is currently in use
> >> >
> >> > I think that'd require duplicating some code between acquire and drop,
> >> > but how about "replication slot "%s" is in use by another backend"?
> > Sold.
>
> Wait ... before you go further ... I object to dropping the word
> "active" from the error message. The column is called "active", and
> that's where a DBA should look; that word needs to stay in the error
> message.
"replication slot "%s" is in active in another backend"?
Alternatively we could replace the boolean active by the owner's pid,
but that's a not entirely trivial change...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-03-13 11:24:13 | Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure" |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-03-13 11:00:58 | Re: 9a57858f1103b89a5674f0d50c5fe1f756411df6 |