Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1
Date: 2014-03-07 13:17:21
Message-ID: 20140307131721.GC4759@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund escribió:

> fprintf(stderr,
> - _("%s: could not identify system: got %d rows and %d fields, expected %d rows and %d fields\n"),
> - progname, PQntuples(res), PQnfields(res), 1, 3);
> + _("%s: could not identify system: got %d rows and %d fields, expected 1 row and 3 or more fields\n"),
> + progname, PQntuples(res), PQnfields(res));

Please don't change this. The reason these messages use %d and an extra
printf argument is to avoid giving translators extra work when the
number of rows or fields is changed. In these cases I suggest this:

> - _("%s: could not identify system: got %d rows and %d fields, expected %d rows and %d fields\n"),
> - progname, PQntuples(res), PQnfields(res), 1, 3);
> + _("%s: could not identify system: got %d rows and %d fields, expected %d rows and %d or more fields\n"),
> + progname, PQntuples(res), PQnfields(res), 1, 3);

(Yes, I know the "expected 1 rows" output looks a bit silly. Since this
is an unexpected error message anyway, I don't think that's worth
fixing.)

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-03-07 13:29:14 Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-03-07 12:44:37 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1