From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1 |
Date: | 2014-03-07 13:17:21 |
Message-ID: | 20140307131721.GC4759@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund escribió:
> fprintf(stderr,
> - _("%s: could not identify system: got %d rows and %d fields, expected %d rows and %d fields\n"),
> - progname, PQntuples(res), PQnfields(res), 1, 3);
> + _("%s: could not identify system: got %d rows and %d fields, expected 1 row and 3 or more fields\n"),
> + progname, PQntuples(res), PQnfields(res));
Please don't change this. The reason these messages use %d and an extra
printf argument is to avoid giving translators extra work when the
number of rows or fields is changed. In these cases I suggest this:
> - _("%s: could not identify system: got %d rows and %d fields, expected %d rows and %d fields\n"),
> - progname, PQntuples(res), PQnfields(res), 1, 3);
> + _("%s: could not identify system: got %d rows and %d fields, expected %d rows and %d or more fields\n"),
> + progname, PQntuples(res), PQnfields(res), 1, 3);
(Yes, I know the "expected 1 rows" output looks a bit silly. Since this
is an unexpected error message anyway, I don't think that's worth
fixing.)
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-03-07 13:29:14 | Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-03-07 12:44:37 | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1 |