| From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PgSql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.1.11 - many backends in "semtimedop" syscall |
| Date: | 2014-03-06 17:03:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20140306170354.GA11879@depesz.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:02:50PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> writes:
> > I didn't have a chance to do it. Can try if there is a way to get trace
> > *without* making core (sorry, my c/gdb knowledge is very, very limited).
>
> Sure, you just attach to the process:
>
> $ gdb /path/to/postgres PID-of-process
> gdb> bt
> gdb> quit
>
> This is usually preferable to forcing a core dump.
Thank you. If the problem will strike again, I will do it on all (or
most, depending how fast I can make it) backends.
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-03-06 17:09:26 | Re: extract psql meta-commands into library? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-03-06 17:02:50 | Re: 9.1.11 - many backends in "semtimedop" syscall |