| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |
| Date: | 2014-03-05 16:53:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20140305165328.GI28321@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:11:51AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> An excellent question. This thread has become mostly about whether
> someone (like, say, me, or in this case Peter) is attempting to pull
> the rug out from under a previously-agreed consensus path forward.
> But despite my asking, nobody's been able to provide a pointer to any
> previous discussion of the points under debate. That's because the
> points that are *actually* being debated here were not discussed
> previously. I recognize that Josh and Andrew would like to make that
> the fault of the people who are now raising objections, but it doesn't
> work like that. The fact that people were and are *generally* in
> favor of jsonb and hstore doesn't mean they have to like the way that
> the patches have turned out.
I am assuming much of this was discussed verbally, and many of us were
not present.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2014-03-05 16:53:31 | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-03-05 16:50:23 | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |