Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node)

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node)
Date: 2014-03-04 14:25:56
Message-ID: 20140304142556.GD12995@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> More generally, I think this discussion is focusing on the wrong set
> of issues. The threshold issue for this patch is whether there is a
> set of hook points that enable a workable custom-scan functionality,
> and whether KaiGai has correctly identified them.

Right- I was trying to hit on that in my email this morning.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-03-04 14:26:45 Re: UNION ALL on partitioned tables won't use indices.
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2014-03-04 14:24:20 Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node)