Re: [PATCH] Use MAP_HUGETLB where supported (v3)

From: Christian Kruse <christian(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use MAP_HUGETLB where supported (v3)
Date: 2014-02-26 10:38:35
Message-ID: 20140226103835.GA16851@defunct.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Peter,

after a night of sleep I'm still not able to swallow the pill. To be
honest I'm a little bit angry about this accusation.

I didn't mean to copy from the Debian wiki and after re-checking the
text again I'm still convinced that I didn't.

Of course the text SAYS something similar, but this is in the nature
of things. Structure, diction and focus are different. Also the
information transferred is different and gathered from various
articles, including the Debian wiki, the huge page docs of the kernel,
the Wikipedia and some old IBM and Oracle docs.

Best regards,

--
Christian Kruse http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian Kruse 2014-02-26 10:41:28 Re: Patch: show xid and xmin in pg_stat_activity and pg_stat_replication
Previous Message Kouhei Kaigai 2014-02-26 09:23:38 Re: contrib/cache_scan (Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?)