Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1
Date: 2014-02-21 11:09:37
Message-ID: 20140221110937.GW28858@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-02-19 13:31:06 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> TBH, as compared to what you've got now, I think this mostly boils
> down to a question of quoting and escaping. I'm not really concerned
> with whether we ship something that's perfectly efficient, or that has
> filtering capabilities, or that has a lot of fancy bells and whistles.
> What I *am* concerned about is that if the user updates a text field
> that contains characters like " or ' or : or [ or ] or , that somebody
> might be using as delimiters in the output format, that a program can
> still parse that output format and reliably determine what the actual
> change was. I don't care all that much whether we use JSON or CSV or
> something custom, but the data that gets spit out should not have
> SQL-injection-like vulnerabilities.

If it's just that, I am *perfectly* happy to change it. What I do not
want is arguments like "I don't want the type information, that's
pointless" because it's actually really important for regression
testing.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ronan Dunklau 2014-02-21 11:09:44 Re: Proposal: IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA statement.
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-02-21 11:07:22 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1