From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josef Grahn <josef(dot)grahn(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bad behaviour on some geometric operations on degenerate polygons |
Date: | 2014-02-15 05:07:20 |
Message-ID: | 20140215050720.GE15047@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:00:09AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > What is odd however, is that we allow _explicit_ creation of zero-radius
> > circles:
>
> > test=> SELECT circle '<(1,1),0>';
> > circle
> > -----------
> > <(1,1),0>
> > (1 row)
>
> > so why do we prevent the conversion of single-point polygons to circles
> > with zero radius? I don't know.
>
> Maybe we should rethink that. What you've done here seems like a kluge.
Yes, it would be much easier to allow the zero-radius circles. The
attached smaller patch allows all the cases to work:
test=> SELECT @@ polygon '((1, 1))';
?column?
----------
(1,1)
(1 row)
test=> SELECT point(polygon '((1, 1))');
point
-------
(1,1)
(1 row)
test=> SELECT circle(polygon '((1, 1))');
circle
-----------
<(1,1),0>
(1 row)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
geo2.diff | text/x-diff | 1.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pierre | 2014-02-15 08:04:01 | No optimization with a partition window in a view |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-02-15 05:00:09 | Re: Bad behaviour on some geometric operations on degenerate polygons |