Re: Bad behaviour on some geometric operations on degenerate polygons

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josef Grahn <josef(dot)grahn(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bad behaviour on some geometric operations on degenerate polygons
Date: 2014-02-15 05:07:20
Message-ID: 20140215050720.GE15047@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:00:09AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > What is odd however, is that we allow _explicit_ creation of zero-radius
> > circles:
>
> > test=> SELECT circle '<(1,1),0>';
> > circle
> > -----------
> > <(1,1),0>
> > (1 row)
>
> > so why do we prevent the conversion of single-point polygons to circles
> > with zero radius? I don't know.
>
> Maybe we should rethink that. What you've done here seems like a kluge.

Yes, it would be much easier to allow the zero-radius circles. The
attached smaller patch allows all the cases to work:

test=> SELECT @@ polygon '((1, 1))';
?column?
----------
(1,1)
(1 row)

test=> SELECT point(polygon '((1, 1))');
point
-------
(1,1)
(1 row)

test=> SELECT circle(polygon '((1, 1))');
circle
-----------
<(1,1),0>
(1 row)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
geo2.diff text/x-diff 1.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pierre 2014-02-15 08:04:01 No optimization with a partition window in a view
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-02-15 05:00:09 Re: Bad behaviour on some geometric operations on degenerate polygons