Re: make vs. gmake

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: make vs. gmake
Date: 2014-02-12 22:08:27
Message-ID: 20140212220827.GA4831@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:28:15PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:49:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > FYI, our source code build docs suggest 'gmake' in a number of places
> > while 'make' would be used on other platforms. Should we change these
> > to just say 'make'? I think we suggested 'gmake' in the past because of
> > FreeBSD having BSD 'make' and requiring GNU make.
>
> FYI, I am going to change 'gmake' mentions in the docs to 'make', as I
> think it meets the need of most of our users/developers.

Done.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-02-12 23:18:35 Re: [HACKERS] Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-02-12 21:46:44 Re: [DOCS] Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.)