From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: make vs. gmake |
Date: | 2014-02-12 22:08:27 |
Message-ID: | 20140212220827.GA4831@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:28:15PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:49:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > FYI, our source code build docs suggest 'gmake' in a number of places
> > while 'make' would be used on other platforms. Should we change these
> > to just say 'make'? I think we suggested 'gmake' in the past because of
> > FreeBSD having BSD 'make' and requiring GNU make.
>
> FYI, I am going to change 'gmake' mentions in the docs to 'make', as I
> think it meets the need of most of our users/developers.
Done.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-02-12 23:18:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2014-02-12 21:46:44 | Re: [DOCS] Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.) |