Re: pgsql and asciidoc output

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org >> PG-General Mailing List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql and asciidoc output
Date: 2014-02-12 14:14:15
Message-ID: 20140212141415.GB3242@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:02:29AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Perhaps, but if we're going to add a text markup format then we'll have
> to choose one out of many.
>
> I personally find Markdown to be more pleasing to the eye than AsciiDoc.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markdown
>
>
> Markdown is really well know now, and can be useful - but there is small
> differences between implementations - wikipedia, github, jira
> but implementation can be really nice

OK, great. Would the markdown implementation differences affect the
psql table output, or are the differences in things we don't need to
worry about?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-02-12 14:14:43 Re: pgsql and asciidoc output
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-02-12 14:12:43 Re: pgsql and asciidoc output