From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Christian Kruse <christian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patch: show xid and xmin in pg_stat_activity and pg_stat_replication |
Date: | 2014-02-12 10:14:56 |
Message-ID: | 20140212101456.GB3162@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-02-11 09:15:45 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> If I understand correctly, modifying PgBackendStatus adds additional
> fields to the shared memory data structure that are never used and
> will be returned by functions like pgstat_fetch_stat_beentry()
> unitialized. That seems both inefficient and a pitfall for the
> unwary.
I don't think the will be unitialized, pgstat_fetch_stat_beentry() will
do a pgstat_read_current_status() if neccessary which will initialize
them.
But they do take up shared memory without really needing to. I
personally don't find that too bad, it's not much memory. If we want to
avoid it we could have a LocalPgBackendStatus that includes the normal
PgBackendStatus. Since pgstat_read_current_status() copies all the data
locally, that'd be a sensible point to fill it. While that will cause a
bit of churn, I'd guess we can use the infrastructure in the not too far
away future for other parts.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2014-02-12 11:24:54 | Re: [BUG] Archive recovery failure on 9.3+. |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-02-12 09:35:41 | Re: Retain dynamic shared memory segments for postmaster lifetime |