Re: notify duplicate elimination performance

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Hardy Falk <hardy(dot)falk(at)blue-cable(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: notify duplicate elimination performance
Date: 2014-02-08 18:02:09
Message-ID: 20140208180209.GB10692@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2014-02-08 18:56:41 +0100, Hardy Falk wrote:
> I know that it is not a big problem for most users, but allowing a very
> large number of notifications while using linear search is a bit dumb.
> I can fix this with a very small modification to
> struct Notification:
> {
> char *channel ;
> char *payload ;
> uint32 hash ;
> struct Notification *left ;
> struct Notification *right ;
> }
> AsyncExistsPendingNotify does an iterative binary tree search.
> The tree is insert-only, there is no need for rebalancing, and the code
> is quite simple.
> Any comments?

Well, you didn't add any code, so it's hard to say... Simple ways of
doing what I think you describe will remove the queue's order. Do you
preserve the ordering guarantees?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hardy Falk 2014-02-08 18:28:56 Re: notify duplicate elimination performance
Previous Message Hardy Falk 2014-02-08 17:56:41 notify duplicate elimination performance