| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: updated emacs configuration |
| Date: | 2014-01-29 03:42:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20140129034254.GB2851@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:40:10PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I see I already asked about entab -s 3. Let me see how hard it would be
> > to modify entab.
>
> TBH I'm not sure we should be changing pgindent at this late date, even if
> there is a good fix for its minor annoyances. When you changed its wrap
> behavior in 8.1, I spent the next several years cursing that decision
> every time I had to back-patch something, because it caused apply failures
> for just about every nontrivial patch. Doing what we're talking about
> here would be just as bad.
Would you like to see how many comments get changed by the adjustment?
Could we run it in all back branches, perhaps only on C comments?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-01-29 04:03:26 | Re: updated emacs configuration |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-01-29 03:40:10 | Re: updated emacs configuration |