Re: [PATCH] Use MAP_HUGETLB where supported (v3)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use MAP_HUGETLB where supported (v3)
Date: 2014-01-27 19:20:23
Message-ID: 20140127192023.GJ10723@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> I spent some time whacking this around, new patch version attached.
> I moved the mmap() code into a new function, that leaves the
> PGSharedMemoryCreate more readable.

Did this patch go anywhere?

Someone just pinged me about a kernel scalability problem in Linux with
huge pages; if someone did performance measurements with this patch,
perhaps it'd be good to measure again with the kernel patch in place.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/26/227

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2014-01-27 19:26:39 Re: PoC: Partial sort
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-01-27 18:58:57 Re: Failure while inserting parent tuple to B-tree is not fun