| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | sameer(dot)kumar(at)ashnik(dot)com |
| Cc: | michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com, dmitry(dot)koterov(at)gmail(dot)com, susan(dot)cassidy(at)decisionsciencescorp(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Fully-automatic streaming replication failover when master dies? |
| Date: | 2014-01-27 03:47:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20140127.124719.559808500638147843.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> I know about PostgresXC, but I thought it is distributed database (similar
> to shards of mongoDB). [Though if I am correct there could be tables which
> are shared across different nodes, but that is not the best way of
> utilizing features of PostgresXC] I think it is not apt to call it
> "synchronous" (since there is no replication happening).
I thought non "eventual consistency" type DB can be called
"synchronous", no? If I am correct, Posgres-XC is definitely
synchronous.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-01-27 04:56:51 | Re: Fully-automatic streaming replication failover when master dies? |
| Previous Message | Sameer Kumar | 2014-01-27 03:35:11 | Re: Fully-automatic streaming replication failover when master dies? |