| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | marco atzeri <marco(dot)atzeri(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd |
| Date: | 2014-01-24 03:50:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20140124035057.GE8993@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:48:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Andrew, should this configuration/code patch be applied to 9.4?
>
> > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51B59794.3000500@gmail.com
>
> > I think we would have to make Cygwin-specific regression output to
> > handle the regression failures, but frankly I am not even sure if they
> > are right.
>
> Those regression failures certainly say there is something broken in
> the submitter's build, so this needs to be taken with a grain of salt.
> I'm not qualified to evaluate the proposed changes, but I wonder why
> they're needed given that we have successful cygwin builds in the
> buildfarm.
Yes, that confuses me too. Unless we get more details, we should ignore
the patches. Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-01-24 03:54:09 | Re: Change authentication error message (patch) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-01-24 03:48:01 | Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd |