Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: marco atzeri <marco(dot)atzeri(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd
Date: 2014-01-24 03:34:28
Message-ID: 20140124033428.GC8993@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:08:36AM +0200, marco atzeri wrote:
> Il 3/6/2013 11:46 PM, Andrew Dunstan ha scritto:
> >
> >Excellent. Will test it out soon.
> >
> >cheers
> >
> >andrew
> >
>
> Andrew,
> please find attached a full patch for cygwin relative to 9.3beta1 :
>
> - DLLTOLL/DLLWRAP are not used anymore, replaced
> by gcc also for postgres.exe (*)
> - DLL versioning is added
>
> Check failures:
> - prepared_xacts is still freezing
> The cygwin failure you highlighted was solved,
> so it should be something else
> - attached the 2 regressions diffs
> tsearch ... FAILED
> without_oid ... FAILED
> The second one seems a new one, not sure cygwin specific

Andrew, should this configuration/code patch be applied to 9.4?

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51B59794.3000500@gmail.com

I think we would have to make Cygwin-specific regression output to
handle the regression failures, but frankly I am not even sure if they
are right.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo Nagata 2014-01-24 03:35:27 Re: Fwd: Proposal: variant of regclass
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2014-01-24 03:33:33 Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?