From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: alternative back-end block formats |
Date: | 2014-01-21 22:06:37 |
Message-ID: | 20140121220637.GE29396@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 06:43:54AM -0500, Christian Convey wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm playing around with Postgres, and I thought it might be fun to experiment
> with alternative formats for relation blocks, to see if I can get smaller files
> and/or faster server performance.
>
> Does anyone know if this has been done before with Postgres? I would have
> assumed yes, but I'm not finding anything in Google about people having done
> this.
Not that I know of.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Chinner | 2014-01-21 22:07:19 | Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-01-21 22:01:42 | Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks) |