| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLESPACE ... MOVE ALL TO ... |
| Date: | 2014-01-20 16:02:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20140120160253.GL31026@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Simon Riggs (simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> > ALTER TABLESPACE name MOVE OWNED TO name opt_nowait
>
> The ALL seems to have value. "MOVE ALL OWNED TO" sounds better.
I could go either way on this, really.
> > ALTER TABLESPACE name MOVE TABLES OWNED TO name opt_nowait
> > ALTER TABLESPACE name MOVE INDEXES OWNED TO name opt_nowait
>
> On those two, I think the docs need to be clearer that we mean that
> TABLES means tables, and yes we leave the indexes behind. Or that
> INDEXES means "and we leave the tables behind. This is intended to
> more easily separate tables and indexes into their own tablespaces."
> or similar.
Sure, I can certainly improve the documentation on that.
> I'm not clamouring for squeezing additional goodies from you, just to
> make a small change to avoid later confusion (for ALL users ;-) )
:) What are your thoughts on what I just proposed to Tom?
> Good feature, thanks for working on it.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Antonin Houska | 2014-01-20 16:10:15 | Re: Backup throttling |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-01-20 16:00:22 | Re: ALTER TABLESPACE ... MOVE ALL TO ... |