From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why conf.d should be default, and auto.conf and recovery.conf should be in it |
Date: | 2014-01-16 16:40:39 |
Message-ID: | 20140116164039.GF21170@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-01-16 11:35:00 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Andres Freund (andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> > So, if we want to support antything but a) relative to pgdata b)
> > relative to postgresql.conf it needs to be configurable at startup
> > time. Possibly with an added initdb switch to set the location.
>
> How would an initdb switch be better than an option in postgresql.conf?
> That sounds very backwards to me. If you meant a *postmaster*/pg_ctl
> option, that would make some sense to me, for folks who would like to
> avoid having a single postgresql.conf at all... Don't know if that
> would work today or not tho.
Oh, I was thinking of initdb option being complementary to a
postgresql.conf option, just setting the path in the generated
postgresql.conf. That way distributions wouldn't have to muck around in
the generated config anymore.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-01-16 16:42:19 | Re: Why conf.d should be default, and auto.conf and recovery.conf should be in it |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-01-16 16:35:00 | Re: Why conf.d should be default, and auto.conf and recovery.conf should be in it |