Re: Where do we stand on 9.3 bugs?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Where do we stand on 9.3 bugs?
Date: 2014-01-14 01:37:14
Message-ID: 20140114013714.GC20335@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-01-13 17:30:55 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 07:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > What remaining issues are there blocking a 9.3.3 release? I know that
> > there were unresolved multixact issues when we put out 9.3.2 --- are
> > those all dealt with now? What else do people see as release-blockers?
>
> I see this bug as a release-blocker. It's a fairly crippling
> replication bug for a bunch of users (5 reports to date):

> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20140106134815.GE28320%40alap2.anarazel.de

Absolutely. I didn't list it because it's not 9.3 specific. I think Tom
is working on a fix right now, if not, Heikki has showed interest and I
would also work on it once the CF has started. So I don't think there's
danger of missing that one.

> Despite actually dating back to 9.0, something in the 9.3.2/9.2.6
> updates is causing users to hit it now. And for those who do hit it,
> replication is impossible and there's no workaround.

There have been reports about it for years if you search in the archives
and the code around it hasn't changed for a fair bit of time, so I think
that's just coincidence.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-01-14 01:40:22 Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance
Previous Message Dave Chinner 2014-01-14 01:30:56 Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance