Re: new json funcs

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new json funcs
Date: 2014-01-10 19:02:01
Message-ID: 20140110190201.GU6840@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> I wonder whether we should add an opr_sanity test verifying that operator
> implementation functions don't have their own comments? The trouble is
> that there are a few that are supposed to, but maybe that list is stable
> enough that it'd be okay to memorialize in the expected output.

+1. It's an easy rule to overlook.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-01-10 19:02:06 Re: [ANNOUNCE] IMCS: In Memory Columnar Store for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-01-10 19:01:15 Re: new json funcs