From: | Christian Kruse <christian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Patch: show relation and tuple infos of a lock to acquire |
Date: | 2014-01-01 10:00:59 |
Message-ID: | 20140101100058.GF25649@defunct.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 31/12/13 13:56, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I think that this is a worthwhile effort, but like Tom I don't think
> that it's universally true that these waiters are waiting on a tuple
> lock. Most obviously, the XactLockTableWait() call you've modified
> within nbtinsert.c is not.
This is why I don't set the tuple data in this case:
XactLockTableWaitSetupErrorContextCallback(rel, NULL);
The second argument is the tuple argument. If it is set to NULL in the
error context callback, all output regarding tuple are suppressed.
> ISTM that you should be printing just the value and the unique index
> there, and not any information about the tuple proper.
Good point, I will have a look at this.
> For better direction about where that new
> infrastructure ought to live, you might find some useful insight from
> commit 991f3e5ab3f8196d18d5b313c81a5f744f3baaea.
Thanks for the pointer!
But, to be honest, I am still unsure where to put this. As far as I
understand this commit has substantial parts in relcache.c and
elog.c – both don't seem to be very good fitting places?
Regards,
--
Christian Kruse http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christian Kruse | 2014-01-01 10:04:33 | Re: Patch: show relation and tuple infos of a lock to acquire |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-01-01 05:12:23 | Re: [BUG FIX] Compare returned value by socket() against PGINVALID_SOCKET instead of < 0 |