| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: array functions - request for opinions (was Re: [PATCHES] array |
| Date: | 2003-05-26 16:22:47 |
| Message-ID: | 2014.1053966167@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> How can you create an aggregate using an operator as a transition function?
You'd have to reference the underlying function. I think what Peter is
really asking is whether the implementation function for || will serve
for this purpose, rather than making an additional one.
> Also (I suppose you could argue this should be fixed, but anyway...),
> you can't currently add elements to an empty array.
That particular manifestation is not relevant; I think you mean this
one:
regression=# select '{}'::int4[] || 2;
ERROR: Arrays greater than one-dimension are not supported
In both cases I think it's mostly a matter of defining a defensible
behavior, which is probably not that hard, but no one's yet gotten
annoyed enough to try to fix it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2003-05-26 16:32:12 | Re: array functions - request for opinions (was Re: [PATCHES] |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-05-26 16:13:55 | Re: array functions - request for opinions (was Re: [PATCHES] |