From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BDR-project |
Date: | 2013-12-27 07:57:46 |
Message-ID: | 20131227075746.GA19290@alap2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2013-12-26 14:26:15 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 12/25/13, 7:01 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/BDR_Project
> > Is implementing main BDR features into core Postgres a probable
> > objective to version 9.4?
Not fully. We hope to integrate some of the building blocks into
postgres soon, so we can reduce the size of the diff. Then the plan is
to iteratively (continue) to submit features required.
> No BDR feature has been proposed for core PostgreSQL so far. Also, this
> feature builds on top of the logical replication features, which are
> themselves questionable for 9.4.
Well, that's not really true. For one, changeset extraction actually is
part of the effort, which surely has been submitted. There also have
been some further submissions which help build robust replication
solutions. One or two of those might be possible to get into 9.4 (they
have been in the last CF...)
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-12-27 08:57:27 | Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-12-27 07:54:53 | Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE |