Re: 9.3 regression with dbt2

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dong Ye <yed(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.3 regression with dbt2
Date: 2013-12-18 19:17:44
Message-ID: 20131218191744.GB26481@alap2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

On 2013-12-18 10:24:56 -0800, Dong Ye wrote:
> It seems that 0ac5ad5134f2769ccbaefec73844f8504c4d6182 is the culprit
> commit.

How long does a run take to verify the problem? Could you retry with the
patch attached to
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20131201114514.GG18793@alap2.anarazel.de
? Based on the theory that it creates many superflous multixacts.

> Flat perf profiles of two such runs look like:

Those aren't really flat profiles tho ;)

> 0ac:
>
> Samples: 706K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 6690377376522
>
>
> + 3.82% postgres postgres [.]
> GetMultiXactIdMembers

Could you expland that one some levels, so we see the callers?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-12-18 19:22:28 Re: [PATCH] SQL assertions prototype
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-12-18 19:13:12 Re: BUG #8673: Could not open file "pg_multixact/members/xxxx" on slave during hot_standby