Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a new reloption, user_catalog_table.

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a new reloption, user_catalog_table.
Date: 2013-12-11 00:56:21
Message-ID: 20131211005621.GA15901@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 2013-12-11 09:54:36 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> > Add a new reloption, user_catalog_table.
> Sorry for not having completely followed the thread of logical
> replication, but wouldn't this deserve some documentation?

I'd say this needs to be documented when the later facilities are
committed. It seems hard to explain without that context.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-12-11 02:48:53 pgsql: doc: Fix DocBook table column count declaration
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2013-12-11 00:54:36 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a new reloption, user_catalog_table.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2013-12-11 00:58:12 Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-12-11 00:55:12 Why the buildfarm is all pink