Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters)

From: Wolfgang Keller <feliphil(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters)
Date: 2013-12-10 19:24:25
Message-ID: 20131210202425.4e54580731cba8190987d525@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-general

> > Seems to me that the editing process of the different parts of
> > postgresql.org somewhat lacks transactional semantics.
>
> postgresql-xc is not postgresql, its a fork.

As an end-user, why would I care.

Since, besides that it's still open-source (even same license as
PostgreSQL itself...?), it's following the PostgreSQL releases pretty
closely. According to their roadmap, version 1.1 has been merged with
PostgreSQL 9.2 and version 1.2 will be merged with 9.3.

It would at least merit being mentioned in the doc, just like other
"forks" or whatever you may call it, as long as they're open-source.

Sincerely,

Wolfgang

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-12-10 19:43:50 Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters)
Previous Message John R Pierce 2013-12-10 17:01:59 Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters)

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-12-10 19:43:50 Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters)
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2013-12-10 19:13:26 Re: While only running pg_dump, postgresql performs writes inside base/ directory. How can we stop this?