| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add %z support to elog/ereport? |
| Date: | 2013-12-08 16:51:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20131208165125.GA16733@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-12-08 11:43:46 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 01:32 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Patch 02 converts some elog/ereport() callers to using the z modifier,
> > some were wrong at least on 64 bit windows.
>
> This is making the assumption that Size is the same as size_t. If we
> are going to commit to that, we might as well get rid of Size.
Well, we're unconditionally defining it as such in c.h and its usage is
pretty much what size_t is for. Given how widespread Size's use is, I am
not seing a realistic way of getting rid of it though.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-12-08 17:01:40 | Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3 |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-12-08 16:43:46 | Re: Add %z support to elog/ereport? |