From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in MultiXactId freezing |
Date: | 2013-12-03 15:37:58 |
Message-ID: | 20131203153758.GC7383@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-12-03 10:29:54 -0500, Noah Misch wrote:
> Sorry, my original report was rather terse. I speak of the scenario exercised
> by the second permutation in that isolationtester spec. The multixact is
> later than VACUUM's cutoff_multi, so 9.3.1 does not freeze it at all. 9.3.2
> does freeze it to InvalidTransactionId per the code I cited in my first
> response on this thread, which wrongly removes a key lock.
That one is clear, I was only confused about the Assert() you
reported. But I think I've explained that elsewhere.
I currently don't see fixing the errorneous freezing of lockers (not the
updater though) without changing the wal format or synchronously waiting
for all lockers to end. Which both see like a no-go?
While it's still a major bug it seems to still be much better than the
previous case of either inaccessible or reappearing rows.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-12-03 15:44:06 | Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in MultiXactId freezing |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2013-12-03 15:29:54 | Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in MultiXactId freezing |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vasily Soshnikov | 2013-12-03 15:44:00 | Dynamic configuration via LDAP in postmaster |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2013-12-03 15:29:54 | Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in MultiXactId freezing |