Re: note to reviewers: reply to the original email

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: note to reviewers: reply to the original email
Date: 2013-12-03 06:18:36
Message-ID: 20131203061836.GA1181521@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:30:05PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> A note to reviewers participating in the commit fests: When you send a
> review of a patch, reply to the email that contains the patch. Do no
> start a new email thread like "Review of 'Some Patch'". This is
> important for several reasons:

+1

> If you don't have the original email in your email client, at least
> doctor up the subject line so it looks like a reply, so that email
> clients can do a reasonable job sorting the two threads together. Yes,
> email is stupid.

You can download a single message as an mbox by clicking "view raw" in the web
archives. Using any email client supporting that format, you can then respond
to the message as though you had received it through a list subscription.

--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sawada Masahiko 2013-12-03 06:30:13 Re: Logging WAL when updating hintbit
Previous Message Noah Misch 2013-12-03 05:47:07 Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in MultiXactId freezing