Re: Draft release notes for 9.3.2

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft release notes for 9.3.2
Date: 2013-12-02 17:58:08
Message-ID: 20131202175808.GB15336@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-12-02 12:26:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I think it might be worth mentioning that (parts) of the data are
> > potentially recoverable without too much effort in all of the bugs.
>
> I thought about that but was afraid that it'd come off like a commercial
> for data recovery services, which didn't seem appropriate. People who
> need this type of service can get advice on the mailing lists, anyway.

Fair argument. Especially when suggested by a person working for a
company providing such services. On that note I'd would take the
following with a grain of salt: I think it's a letting users a bit alone
with their problems. Maybe: "Data might be recoverable."?

Thanks!

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-12-02 17:59:41 Re: Trust intermediate CA for client certificates
Previous Message Karsten Hilbert 2013-12-02 17:57:53 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency