| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. |
| Date: | 2013-12-02 14:54:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20131202145436.GA8924@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-12-02 09:41:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> At the same time, I'm pretty skeptical that any simple regression-test
> type facility would have caught the bugs we've fixed lately ...
Agreed, but it would make reorganizing stuff to be more robust more
realistic. At the moment for everything you change you have to hand-test
everyting possibly affected which takes ages.
I think we also needs support for testing xid/multixid wraparound. It
currently isn't realistically testable because of the timeframes
involved.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-12-02 14:59:12 | Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. |
| Previous Message | Asit Mahato | 2013-12-02 14:49:43 | Add full object name to the tag field |