Re: Any advantage of using SSL with a certificate of authority?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Any advantage of using SSL with a certificate of authority?
Date: 2013-11-26 21:48:33
Message-ID: 20131126214833.GA9629@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:30:08PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 12:16 PM, Robin wrote:
>
> 1. A self-signed certificate can be issued by anybody, there is no way of
> authenticating the issuer.
> 2. Distributing self-signed certificates becomes a pain - if signed by a
> CA, its easy to lodge your public key where everybody can find it, and
> knows where to look for it.
> 3. Maintenance becomes a problem
>
>
>
> while that's all true for public https or whatever, none of this applies to a
> point to point connection like libpq -> postmaster.

Right. I know of no mechanism to verify a certificate via a public CA
through SSL. Browsers have a list of trusted certificates, but SSL
alone doesn't, as far as I know.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-11-26 23:25:44 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2013-11-26 21:22:48 Re: tracking scripts...