From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, alexsav23(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #8611: ECPG: unclosed comment "/*" |
Date: | 2013-11-25 15:42:30 |
Message-ID: | 20131125154230.GA28564@feivel.credativ.lan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:34:00AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> What I was concerned about was the fear that previously-working ecpg
> programs would be broken by this change. I think what you're saying
> is that any such program would have failed anyhow at the compilation
> stage --- is that right? If so I withdraw the complaint.
Yes, that is indeed correct.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | v.langard | 2013-11-25 15:56:40 | BUG #8630: Planner behavior change between PG 9.0.14 and 9.3.1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-25 14:34:00 | Re: BUG #8611: ECPG: unclosed comment "/*" |