From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, alexsav23(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #8611: ECPG: unclosed comment "/*" |
Date: | 2013-11-25 08:37:55 |
Message-ID: | 20131125083755.GC16770@feivel.credativ.lan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 09:53:29PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I tend to agree with Tom here but I feel like I'm missing something-
> will this only make things "work" which would fail previously..? We
Yes, that's the way I see it.
> certainly don't want to risk breaking things for existing users, but
> perhaps it's not possible to have existing code which works and this is
> only 'loosening' of what we accept.
We're not exactly loosening but we aligning with what the C compiler accepts,
if that makes any sense.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | jonathan.camile | 2013-11-25 10:27:40 | BUG #8629: Strange resultset when using CTE or a subselect |
Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2013-11-25 08:36:44 | Re: BUG #8611: ECPG: unclosed comment "/*" |