| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Hilbert, Sebastian" <Sebastian(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
| Date: | 2013-11-22 21:02:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20131122210228.GE17400@alap2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-11-22 12:45:25 -0800, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > That looks sane for pg_dump, but I would rather have expected
> > that pg_dumpall would need to emit the same thing (possibly more
> > than once due to reconnections).
>
> I was kinda surprised myself. I changed it for pg_dump, tested
> that, and then tested pg_dumpall to get a baseline, and the setting
> was taken care of.
pg_dumpall is lazy and just executes pg_dump for every database, that's
the reason... But are you sure it also unsets default_transaction_readonly for
the roles etc. it creates?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-11-22 21:07:29 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
| Previous Message | Juan Daniel Santana Rodés | 2013-11-22 20:56:45 | Recursive function |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-11-22 21:07:29 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-11-22 20:51:45 | Re: Building on S390 |