| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Autoconf 2.69 update |
| Date: | 2013-11-20 14:58:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20131120145858.GG25406@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-11-20 09:53:53 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> As a rule, you're not supposed to bother including the configure output
> script in a submitted diff anyway. Certainly any committer worth his
> commit bit is going to ignore it and redo autoconf for himself.
The committer maybe, but it's a PITA for reviewers on machines without
the matching autoconf version around. Which at least currently
frequently isn't packaged anymore...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-20 15:04:22 | Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-20 14:53:53 | Re: Autoconf 2.69 update |