Re: Review:Patch: SSL: prefer server cipher order

From: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review:Patch: SSL: prefer server cipher order
Date: 2013-11-16 21:13:56
Message-ID: 20131116211356.GA23666@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 01:03:05PM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 12:37 PM, Marko Kreen wrote:
> >Thanks for testing!
> >
> >On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:17:40PM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> >>On 11/16/2013 06:24 AM, Marko Kreen wrote:
> >>>ssl-better-default:
> >>> SSL should stay working, openssl ciphers -v 'value' should not contain
> >>> any weak suites (RC4, SEED, DES-CBC, EXP, NULL) and no non-authenticated
> >>> suites (ADH/AECDH).
> >>
> >>Not sure about the above, if it is a GUC I can't find it. If it is
> >>something else than I will have to plead ignorance.
> >
> >The patch just changes the default value for 'ssl_ciphers' GUC.
>
> I am still not sure what patch you are talking about. The two
> patches I saw where for server_prefer and ECDH key exchange.
>
> >
> >The question is if the value works at all, and is good.
> >
>
> What value would we be talking about?

Ah, sorry. It's this one:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1310

> Note: I have been working through a head cold and thought processes
> are sluggish, handle accordingly:)

Get better soon! :)

--
marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2013-11-16 21:30:48 Re: additional json functionality
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2013-11-16 21:03:05 Re: Review:Patch: SSL: prefer server cipher order