From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: what checksum algo? |
Date: | 2013-11-14 01:53:35 |
Message-ID: | 20131114.105335.1101542663785744329.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
It was good to see you in Japan.
PostgreSQL Enterprise Consortium (non profit PostgreSQL related
organization in Japan. http://www.pgecons.org) is about to inspect the
performance impact of the checksum using High-end PC server (real 80
cores with 2TB memory). What in my mind is using pgbench with custom
query (purely SELECT). Is there any recommendations/suggestions in
doing that?
(The result will be in public of course).
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> CRC16 is used.
>
> Actually, subsequently another algorithm was introduced - see commit
> 43e7a668499b8a69a62cc539a0fbe6983384339c .
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Peter Geoghegan
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2013-11-14 02:22:37 | Re: what checksum algo? |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2013-11-14 01:12:30 | Re: what checksum algo? |