| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | J Smith <dark(dot)panda+lists(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Errors on missing pg_subtrans/ files with 9.3 |
| Date: | 2013-11-12 16:13:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20131112161352.GD23777@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2013-11-12 10:56:55 -0500, J Smith wrote:
> G'day list. Didn't get any interest in pgsql-general, thought I'd try
> my luck here, which perhaps would be more fitting in case I've
> stumbled upon an edge case issue or something...
Normally the bug report for/the -bugs mailing list is the right one for
things like this.
> ERROR could not access status of transaction 4179979
> Could not open file "pg_subtrans/003F": No such file or directory.
A couple of question:
* Did you have any OS, hardware crashes?
* Do you run with fsync=off or full_page_writes=off?
* Could you post the pg_controldata output?
* Is it always the same xid?
* Does SELECT count(*) FROM pg_prepared_xacts; return 0?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-12 16:18:32 | Transaction-lifespan memory leak with plpgsql DO blocks |
| Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-11-12 16:13:22 | Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan? |