From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Subject: | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead |
Date: | 2013-11-12 06:01:58 |
Message-ID: | 20131112060158.GA818667@tornado.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:17:54AM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> The old contents of my GIT repository was removed so you need to
> clone it fresh. https://github.com/zboszor/ecpg-readahead.git
> I won't post the humongous patch again, since sending a 90KB
> compressed file to everyone on the list is rude.
Patches of that weight show up on a regular basis. I don't think it's rude.
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2013-11-12 06:03:29 | Updatable security_barrier views (was: [v9.4] row level security) |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2013-11-12 04:10:51 | Re: Re: Exempting superuser from row-security isn't enough. Run predicates as DEFINER? |