Re: Something fishy happening on frogmouth

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Something fishy happening on frogmouth
Date: 2013-10-31 09:50:21
Message-ID: 20131031095021.GA31628@alap2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2013-10-31 11:33:28 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Wait, that sounds horrible. If you kill -9 the server, and then rm -rf
> $PGDATA, the shared memory segment is leaked until next reboot? I find that
> unacceptable. There are many scenarios where you never restart postmaster
> after a crash. For example, if you have an automatic failover setup; you
> fail over to the standby in case of crash, and re-initialize the old master
> with e.g rsync.

Our main shared memory segment works the same way, doesn't it? And it
has for a long time.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mitsumasa KONDO 2013-10-31 10:36:45 Add accurate option to pgbench
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-10-31 09:33:28 Re: Something fishy happening on frogmouth