From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Failure while inserting parent tuple to B-tree is not fun |
Date: | 2013-10-22 20:53:17 |
Message-ID: | 20131022205317.GB9370@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-10-22 16:38:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On 2013-10-22 15:24:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> No, that's hardly a good idea. As Heikki says, that would amount to
> >> converting an entirely foreseeable situation into a PANIC.
>
> > But IIUC this can currently lead to an index giving wrong answers, not
> > "just" fail at further inserts?
>
> No. It's exactly the same situation as when the insert is still in
> progress, ie searches have to move right when following the original
> downlink. Go read the nbtree README.
If the parent insert is still in progress we have a write lock on the
left and right page preventing such issues, right? At least that's what
the nbtree README says...
That doesn't hold true if we split a page but fail before re-inserting
the parent since the transaction rollback will obviously have released
the locks.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-10-22 21:06:05 | Re: Reasons not to like asprintf |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2013-10-22 20:52:20 | Re: Commitfest II CLosed |